Anju Rani v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought directions to join a teacher post. Court noted petitioner had already joined the college upon appointment, rendering the petition moot, and dismissed it.
Petitioner sought directions to join a teacher post. Court noted petitioner had already joined the college upon appointment, rendering the petition moot, and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1888 of 2022
Petitioner :- Anju Rani Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Heard Sri Sarvesh Kumar Singh, holding brief of Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-1 & 3.
Present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed for direction to respondents-3 & 4 to join the petitioner on the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (Math) in Kasturba Kanya Uchchtar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Saakhwaniya, District Kushinagar in pursuance of his appointment letter dated 12.11.2021.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner joined the said college on 7.4.2022 and as such, the relief claimed in the writ petition has been fulfilled.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 20.4.2022 Noman
Digitally signed by NOMAN AHMAD Date: 2022.04.21 12:04:43 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anju Rani
State Of U.P.
Rajiv Joshi
Noman Ahmad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court