Abdul Razzaq v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Held the writ petition dismissed as infructuous since the relief prayed had been granted to the petitioner.
Held the writ petition dismissed as infructuous since the relief prayed had been granted to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1852 of 2022
Petitioner :- Abdul Razzaq Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bramh Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Heard Mr. Bramh Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the Staterespondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous as the relief prayed by the petitioner has already been granted.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 30.3.2022 Jitendra/-
Digitally signed by JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV Date: 2022.03.31 11:33:04 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdul Razzaq
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court