The Court allowed the writ petition for payment of death gratuity to the petitioner, setting aside the impugned order dated 25.9.2018 in reliance on a recent decision of the learned Single Judge in Writ - A No. 8605 of 2022.
Order dated 25.9.2018 set aside; present writ petition allowed in terms of the recent order of the learned Single Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17326 of 2022
Petitioner :- Bhavneshwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nand Lal Pandey,Suyash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 31.10.2022 Faraz
Digitally signed by FARAZ AHMAD Date: 2022.10.31 16:10:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner's claim for death gratuity should be maintained in light of a recent decision of the learned Single Judge.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
learned Single Judge in Writ - A No. 8605 of 2022Applied¶2
Writ - A No. 8605 of 2022
Bhavneshwari
State Of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
