The petition seeking direction for salary payment from a private institution was found not maintainable under writ jurisdiction, being contract of private service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17148 of 2022
Petitioner :- Prashant Bansal Respondent :- Central Board Of Secondary Education Siksha Kendra And Community Centre And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Priyavrat Tripathi,Ashish Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- Hridai Narain Pandey
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.N. Pandey learned counsel for the respondents.
Inasmuch as direction has been sought on a private institution to pay the salary to the petitioner, writ petition is found to be not maintainable. Leaving it open to the petitioner to enforce his contract of private service, under common law, the writ petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 21.10.2022 Faraz
Digitally signed by FARAZ AHMAD Date: 2022.10.21 17:32:59 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition is maintainable for directing a private institution to pay salary to the petitioner under a contract of private service.
Prashant Bansal
Central Board Of Secondary Education Siksha Kendra And Community Centre And 2 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
