Petitioner withdrew the present PIL with liberty to file a fresh petition giving better particulars. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 23
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 687 of 2022
Nizamuddin .....Petitioner
Through :- Mr. Bhaju Ram Prasad Sharma, Advocate
v/s
Union of India and others
Union of India and others .....Respondent Through :- Ms. Akansha Sharma, Standing Counsel for respondent nos. and Mr. Sudhir Bharti, Advocate for respondent no.
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one giving better particulars.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 20.04.2022
Rahul Dwivedi/Amit Mishra
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by RAHUL DWIVEDI Date: 2022.04.21 16:35:41 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nizamuddin
Union of India
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
