A PIL petition filed by Meena Devi was dismissed as withdrawn by a single-judge bench, with liberty granted to the petitioner to avail of any alternative remedy.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail of appropriate alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.28
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 644 of 2022
Meena Devi .....Petitioner Through :- Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondents
Through :- Mr. Ajay Prakash Paul, State Law Officer for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.4
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad
12.04.2022
Rakesh/Kuldeep
Whether the order is speaking : No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by RAKESH MEHTA Date: 2022.04.21 17:35:42 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Meena Devi
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
