This order dismisses a PIL seeking to direct the government to establish a block at a specific village. The court held that block establishment is an administrative function requiring multiple factors, not suitable for judicial interference via PIL.
The petition directed to establish a block at a specific village was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No.20
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 525 of 2022
Mange Ram Arya .....Petitioner Through :- Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate
v/s
State of U.P. and others .....Respondents Through :- Mr. Ajay Prakash Paul, State Law Officer for the respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 12.04.2022
Rakesh/Kuldeep
Whether the order is speaking : Yes Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
Digitally signed by RAKESH MEHTA Date: 2022.04.21 17:39:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can entertain a PIL to direct the establishment of a block at a specific village instead of another.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mange Ram Arya
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
