The High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation regarding environmental issues, holding that the National Green Tribunal had already taken cognizance of the matter.
The petition was dismissed with no reason to entertain the same as the National Green Tribunal has already taken cognizance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Ju Court Serial N
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 183 of 2022
Rajendra Prasad Gupta CORAM HON'BLE RAJESH : BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE PRAKASH Throug h :-Mr. Pramod Pathak, Advocate PADIA, JUDGE
v/s
State of U.P. and others
spo
Through : Mr. Jagdish Pathak, Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 - and 2 Mr. Bipin Bihari Pandey, Advocate for respondent No.3 ORDER
It is evident from the pleadings in the petition for the issue sought to be raised by the petitioner in the present petition filed in public interest, cognizance has already been taken by the National Green Tribunal.
Considering the aforesaid fact and the issue being related to environment, we do not find any reason to entertain the present petition in public interest. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
( R a (P j ra e k s as h h B P i a n di d a, a J.) l, C .J . )
Allahabad 17.02.2022
Kuldeep/AHA
Whether the order is speaking : Whether the order is reportable :
Yes Yes/No
Rajendra Prasad Gupta
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
