Ram Sanehi Patel v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *** ORDER Learned…
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *** ORDER Learned…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Ju Court Serial N
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 166 of 2022
Ram Sanehi Patel CORAM HON'BLE RAJESH : BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE PRAKASH Through :-Mr. Anuj Srivastava, Advocate for Anurag Rai, Advocate PADIA, JUDGE
v/s
State of U.P. and others
spo
Through :-Mr. Meenakshi Singh, State Law Officer for the respondents
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one for the same relief, complying with the provisions of the High Court Rules and orders with reference to filing of petitions in public interest.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Allahabad
( R a (P j ra e k s as h h B P i a n di d a, a J.) l, C .J . )
17.02.2022 Kuldeep/AHA
Whether the order is No speaking : Whether the order is Yes/No reportable :
Ram Sanehi Patel
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court