The High Court dismissed a criminal transfer application (No. 53 of 2018) dated 18.2.2022. Neither the applicant nor the second respondent appeared, leading to dismissal for want of prosecution.
Transfer Application No. 53 of 2018 dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 53 of 2018
Applicant :- Mohd. Kaif @ Sahil Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Awadh Mishra,Siddhartha Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Awadhesh Kumar Malviya
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
None responds the call either on behalf of applicant or opposite party no. 2.
In view of the above, this Transfer Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.2.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.02.18 14:10:30 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a transfer application can be dismissed for want of prosecution when parties fail to appear without valid reasons.
Mohd. Kaif @ Sahil
State of U.P.
Another
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
