The transfer application was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the applicant nor the opposite parties appeared to respond.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 405 of 2017
Applicant :- Nipun Bansal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Irfanul Huda,S.H. Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Arun Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called in the revised list.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
None responds either on behalf of applicant or O.P. Nos. 2 and 3.
Accordingly, the present Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.2.2022 A. Mandhani
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK MANDHANI Date: 2022.02.17 14:30:52 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nipun Bansal
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
