Pramod Goel v. State of U.P. and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The application was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the applicant nor the second respondent appeared to substantiate their case.
The application was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither the applicant nor the second respondent appeared to substantiate their case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 42 of 2018
Applicant :- Pramod Goel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Kumar Dhananjay
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
None responds the call either on behalf of applicant or opposite party no. 2.
In view of the above, this Transfer Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.2.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.02.18 14:05:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pramod Goel
State Of U.P.
Anr
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court