Hari Om v. State of U.P. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal transfer application was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to take necessary steps despite multiple listings and notices.
The criminal transfer application was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to take necessary steps despite multiple listings and notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CRIMINAL) No. - 100 of 2018
Applicant :- Hari Om Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Perusal of the record reveals that this Transfer Application was listed on 8.03.2022 and notices were directed to be issued to O.P. Nos. 2 to 6 but applicant did not take steps. This case was again listed on 21.02.2022, 14.03.2022 and on 18.04.2022 but yet applicant did not take steps.
It appears that applicant is not interested in prosecution of this Transfer Application.
In view of the above, this Transfer Application deserves to be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, this Transfer Application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 25.4.2022 A. Mandhani
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK MANDHANI Date: 2022.04.26 16:00:11 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Om
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court