The single-judge High Court held that the filed Habeas Corpus Writ Petition had become legally infructuous, as no further reliefs were required or applicable to be granted.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 259 of 2019
Petitioner :- Mohd. Alim Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anup Kumar Khare Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Krishna Dutt Tiwari
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned counsel for respondent no. 5 & 6, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the parties informed that this petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.4.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.04.25 15:19:07 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Alim
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
