An infructuous Habeas Corpus petition filed against the State of U.P. was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court after counsel informed that the underlying matter had become resolved.
The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 217 of 2020
Petitioner :- Anamika Shahi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Srivastava,Arvind Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Vikarm Singh Yadav
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 3, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners informs that this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 25.4.2022 A. Mandhani
Digitally signed by ABHISHEK MANDHANI Date: 2022.04.26 16:01:27 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Anamika Shahi
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
