Union of India v. M/S Mata Din
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared to press the appeal before the Court.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 40
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 977 of 1981
Appellant :- Union of India Respondent :- M/S Mata Din Counsel for Appellant :- A.Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Shekhar Srivastava
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The case has been taken up in the revised call.
No one is present for the parties to press the Second Appeal.
The Second Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 3.11.2022 vkj
(Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Digitally signed by VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL Date: 2022.11.04 16:30:28 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union of India
- respondent
M/S Mata Din
Coram
Siddhartha Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/977/1981
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court