The second appeal filed by Nanhey was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the appeal in the revised call list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 939 of 1981
Appellant :- Nanhey Respondent :- Smt. Shiv Kumari And Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- R.J.D. Mishra,Murlidhar,R.P.Singh,Ram Vijay Counsel for Respondent :- K.N. Tripathi,B.M. Mishra,Neeraj Tripathi,Prakash Dubey,S.P. Dubey,V.S. Pandey
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
List has been revised.
Even though Mohd. Abusad appears on behalf of Sri Neeraj Tripathi learned counsel for the respondents, no one appears for the appellant to press the second appeal even in the revised call. The second appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 3.11.2022 PK
(Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR Date: 2022.11.04 10:05:15 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nanhey
Smt. Shiv Kumari And Ors.
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
