Jamuna Prasad and Others v. Subedar Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
No advocate appeared to press the Second Appeal; the matter was dismissed for want of prosecution.
No advocate appeared to press the Second Appeal; the matter was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 929 of 1981
Appellant :- Jamuna Prasad And Others Respondent :- Subedar Singh Counsel for Appellant :- Triloki Nath Counsel for Respondent :- J.N.Tiwari
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
The case has been taken up in the revised call.
No one is present for the parties to press the Second Appeal.
The Second Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 3.11.2022 vkj
(Siddhartha Varma,J.)
Digitally signed by VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL Date: 2022.11.04 16:30:56 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jamuna Prasad And Others
Subedar Singh
Siddhartha Varma
Vijay Krishna Jaiswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court