Brij Pal and Another v. Prem Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed in default due to the absence of counsel for the appellants at the hearing of the second appeal heard by the single judge.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 489 of 2011
Appellant :- Brij Pal And Another Respondent :- Prem Singh Counsel for Appellant :- P.K. Srivastava,D.S. Yadav,V.D. Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.K.S. Bais
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
List has been revised. No one appeared for the appellants.
The appeal is dismissed in default due to absence of counsel for the appellants.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 25.4.2022 Mini
Digitally signed by MINI KANAUJIYA Date: 2022.04.25 15:43:26 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Brij Pal And Another
- respondent
Prem Singh
Coram
Salil Kumar Rai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/489/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court