Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 64 of 2020 dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear to press the case before the Hon'ble Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 64 of 2020
Petitioner :- Jyoti Nishad (Corpus) Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajai Kumar Srivastava,Amit Kumar Satsangi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Shabana Nizam
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None responds the call on behalf of petitioner.
Heard learned AGA for the state and perused the record.
As nobody is present to press this petition, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.4.2022 v.k.updh.
Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY Date: 2022.04.07 15:10:27 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jyoti Nishad
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
