Habeas Corpus Writ Petition was called and not pressed by the petitioner on behalf of petitioners. No other party represented. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 56 of 2020
Petitioner :- Nisha And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Nandini Mishra
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None responds the call on behalf of petitioners.
Heard learned AGA for the state and perused the record.
As nobody is present to press this petition, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.4.2022 v.k.updh.
Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY Date: 2022.04.07 15:10:31 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nisha
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
