The writ court dismissed a habeas corpus petition for want of prosecution as no one responded to the call to appear on behalf of either the petitioners or the remaining respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 18 of 2020
Petitioner :- Soniya Saini And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vineet Kumar Sahu Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ram Murat
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called in the revised list.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
None responds the call either on behalf of petitioners or respondent no. 4 & 5.
In view of the above, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 6.4.2022 VPS
Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH SHARMA Date: 2022.04.06 13:39:02 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sonia Saini And Another
State Of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
