The High Court disposed of an old habeas corpus petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time, dismissing the writ without hearing the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 89
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 5010 of 2009
Petitioner :- Smt. Jyoti Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Narayan Singh,B.P. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Anal Agrawal,K.C.Pandey,N.C. Agarwal,N.L. Agarwal
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Case called in the revised list.
None responds the call either on behalf of petitioner or respondent nos. 2 & 3.
Heard learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This petition is pending since 2009 and has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.3.2022 mt
Digitally signed by MITHILESH KUMAR Date: 2022.03.11 16:14:52 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Jyoti
State of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
Mithlesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
