A single-judge bench dismissed a filed Habeas Corpus writ petition regarding the detention of the corpus. The court relied on the court records and the lack of appearances to conclude that the legislative averments were sufficient, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 108 of 2020
Petitioner :- Shiv Dayal Singh And Anr. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Singh Sengar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
In view of the averment made in paragraphs 3 & 4 of the afÏdavit of compliance it cannot be said that the corpus has been illegally detained. None has otherwise appeared for the petitioners when the matter is taken up.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed.
Order Date :- 4.4.2022 Ranjeet Sahu
Digitally signed by RANJEET SAHU Date: 2022.04.05 14:38:57 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the averments in the affidavit of compliance suffice to conclude that the corpus has not been illegally detained.
Shiv Dayal Singh And Anr.
State Of U.P. And 4 Ors.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
