Petitioners in two criminal miscellaneous writ petitions prayed to withdraw the petitions intending to pursue remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2128 of 2022
Petitioner :- Nagendra Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anshul Kumar Singhal
AND
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2307 of 2022
Petitioner :- Neeraj Agarwal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anshul Kumar Singhal
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Affidavits have been exchanged between the parties today, which are taken on record.
After some arguments in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners comes up with the prayer to withdraw these petitions as the petitioners intend to pursue their remedy available under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Prayer made is allowed.
Writ petitions are, accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 1.4.2022 Banswar
Digitally signed by RAM NARESH BANSWAR Date: 2022.04.01 14:47:38 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nagendra Pathak
State Of U.P.
Neeraj Agarwal
State Of U.P.
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Rajnish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
