The High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the case, leading to the vacation of any interim orders.
The appeal has been dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 73 of 1996
Appellant :- Shri Nanak Chand Respondent :- Smt. Munni Devi And Others Counsel for Appellant :- A.K. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- ,Parv Agarwal
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of appellant to press this appeal.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.9.2022 sailesh
Digitally signed by SAILESH PRAJAPATI Date: 2022.09.07 17:48:04 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
whether the appeal should be dismissed due to absence of the appellant.
Shri Nanak Chand
Smt. Munni Devi
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
