Single judge order dismissing the revision for want of prosecution due to the absence of counsel for the revisionist.
Revision dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 25 of 2020
Revisionist :- Amit Sharma Opposite Party :- Vidya Sagar Birmani Counsel for Revisionist :- Nipun Singh,Ashutosh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Amitabh Agarwal,Jai Shanker Audichya
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of revisionist to press this revision.
Sri Jai Shanker Audichya, learned counsel for the opposite party is present.
The revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 6.9.2022 sailesh
Digitally signed by SAILESH PRAJAPATI Date: 2022.09.06 16:56:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Amit Sharma
Vidya Sagar Birmani
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
