A first appeal from an order of 2000 was dismissed by the High Court for non-prosecution when the appellant was absent on the hearing date, vacating any interim orders.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1395 of 2000
Appellant :- Sardar Harbans Singh Respondent :- Chhunna Lal And Another Counsel for Appellant :- ,Amarjeet Singh Rakhara,D.V.Jaiswal,P.C. Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- A.K.Singh,Anita Srivastava,Ramesh Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of appellant.
Ms. Anita Srivastava, learned counsel for respondents is present.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 6.9.2022 Kpy
Digitally signed by KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV Date: 2022.09.06 17:11:20 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sardar Harbans Singh
Chhunna Lal
Vipin Chandra Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
