Asgar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Criminal Revision case, the single-judge bench observed that the opposite party was present but the revisionist was absent. Due to the absence of counsel for the revisionist, the court held the delay condonation application rejected and dismissed the revision as time-barred.
What did the court decide?
Delay condonation application rejected; Criminal Revision dismissed as barred by time.