The High Court held that a criminal revision against an interlocutory order directing medical age examination for a juvenile accused is not maintainable as the order did not involve illegality, impropriety, or irregularity warranting intervention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 91
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2085 of 2015
Revisionist :- Vijay Kumar @ Maheshwari Minor Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Manoj Kumar Srivastava,Rahul Kumar Pabdey
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Order Date :- 15.11.2022
Asha
Digitally signed by ASHA Date: 2022.11.16 17:10:05 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision maintainable against an interlocutory order calling for medical age determination.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vijay Kumar @ Maheshwari Minor
State of U.P.
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
