In Criminal Revision No. 768 of 2022, the court dismissed the revision as the revisionist, Harnarayan, did not press the same in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 768 of 2022
Revisionist :- Harnarayan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ram Surat Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Sri Ram Surat Patel, learned counsel for the revisionist on instruction states that the revisionist does not want to press the instant revision.
Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 14.3.2022 Ashish Pd.
Digitally signed by ASHISH PRASAD Date: 2022.03.14 16:55:44 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Harnarayan
State of U.P.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Ashish Pd.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
