Raj Kishore Vs the State of U.P.

Court No. - 10

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 326 of 2009

Revisionist :- Raj Kishore Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- A.P. Singh Vishen Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

None appears for the revisionist to press this revision even in the revised call.

¶6

Learned A.G.A. is present for the Staterespondent.

¶7

Present revision under section 397 Cr.P.C. read with section 401 Cr.P.C. has been filed against the Judgment and order dated 14-05-2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C., Court No. 5, Gonda in Sessions Trial No. 49/2009, arising out of Case Crime No. 249/1998, under sections 307/323 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali Dehatdistrict-Gonda.

¶8

The learned trial court after considering the evidence brought on record and submissions on behalf of the prosecution and defence did not find the guilt proved against the accused-respondents for offence under sections 307 and 323 I.P.C. and acquitted them for the charge for said offences. This court has considered the impugned Judgment and order and finds that the trial court has not committed any error in appreciating the evidence or error of law. The view taken by the learned trial court is plausible one.

¶9

This court, therefore, does not find any ground to interfere with the impugned Judgment and order dated 14-05-2009. The revision is dismissed.

¶10

Order Date :- 17.8.2022 AKS

¶11

Digitally signed by ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.08.17 20:00:39 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Raj Kishore v. the State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kishore v. the State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Geeta Awasthi Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vivek Prakash and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home. Lko and Another

Sandeep Kumar and Anothers Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home and Anothers

Shashi Kant Tripathi Vs State of U.P. and 5 Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Dukhraja Vs State of U.P. and 3 Ors.