A criminal revision filed under sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. praying for interference with the trial court's acquittal. No advocate appeared for the revisionist. The court found no ground to interfere and dismissed the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 25 of 2010
Revisionist :- Smt. Dukhraja Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Revisionist :- Ravindra Kumar Yadav,Kamlesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Order Date :- 17.8.2022 AKS
Digitally signed by ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.08.17 18:41:32 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
whether the revision against the acquittal of respondents should be allowed.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Dukhraja
State Of U.P.
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
