Rakesh Kumar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a criminal revision filed against judgments of the Additional Sessions Judge and Magistrate. Finding no error in the courts below, the revision was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Revised appeal dismissed; lower courts' judgments and orders maintained.
What the court decided
Court No. - 10
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 161 of 2009
Revisionist :- Rakesh Kumar and others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- S.S. Rathore,C.P. Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
- This criminal revision, under Section 397/401 CrPC, has been filed against the judgment and order dated 21.03.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 7, Unnao in Criminal Appeal No.28 of 2008, which was filed by the revisionists against the judgment and order dated 20.08.2008 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Unnao in Criminal Case No.1563 of 2007, arising out of Case Crime No.039 of 2003, under Sections 452, 323 and 504 IPC lodged at Police Station Asivan, District Unnao.
- The learned Magistrate found the revisionists guilty of committing offences under Sections 452/323/504 IPC, however, released them on probation for six months for maintaining peace and good behaviour in the society under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. Fine of Rs.400/- was imposed upon each of the revisionists (total Rs.1600) and, out of this amount, Rs. 1000/- was directed to be paid to the injured.
- The learned appellate Court vide the impugned judgment and order dismissed the appeal and maintained the order of punishment passed by the learned trial Court intact, however, directed the revisionists to deposited Rs.200/-, in place of Rs.400/-, as case expenses.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision filed under Section 397/401 CrPC discloses any error of law, fact, or evidence requiring interference in revisional jurisdiction.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rakesh Kumar and others
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Dinesh Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- /161/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court