A revision against a conviction order of 1997 was allowed to lapse due to the efflux of time as no one appeared to argue. The High Court found no illegality in the impugned order and dismissed the revision.
The revision is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 138 of 1997
Revisionist :- Maddey Khan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- V.Saran Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist(s) to press this revision.
Sri Vinod Kant, learned Addl. Advocate General assisted by Sri Vaibhav Anand, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This revision has been filed against the order of conviction.
Learned Addl. Advocate General submits that the present revision is of the year 1997 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below and have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned AGA. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) passed by the court(s) below.
In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order(s) under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order(s) under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned AGA that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onward transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
Let the lower court record, if any, be returned back to the court concerned.
The file is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 8.3.2022 SP
Digitally signed by SALIM PRAVEJ Date: 2022.03.15 16:08:57 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
