Dismissed
Mukhtar Singh Karnwal v. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad HCCRLR/1067/2001
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1067 of 2001…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1067 of 2001…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1067 of 2001
Revisionist :- Mukhtar Singh Karnwal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Hari Om Khare Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.
Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 17.01.2001 passed by Ist Additional Chief Judicial Magistrarte Muzafar Nagar in Criminal complaint Case No. 1247/9 of 1998 (Mukhtyar Vs. Sagwan and others) under Sections 147, 427, 149, 504, 506 and 430 I.P.C., whereby the court below had acquitted the opposite parties from the offence committed under Sections 147, 427, 149, 504, 506 and 430 I.P.C. and also cancelled the personal security bond.
Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh submits that the present revision is of the year, 2001 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and order passed by the court below and also perused the record. I have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned A.G.A.. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order passed by the court below.
In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned A.G.A. that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onwards transmission to the concerned Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
The file is consigned to record.
Let the lower Court record, if any, be returned back to the concerned Court.
Order Date :- 8.3.2022 Arvind
Digitally signed by ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.03.10 09:58:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shamim Ahmed
Arvind Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court