In this criminal revision against a maintenance order, the High Court dismissed the petition. The court noted the absence of the revisionist's counsel and found no illegality in the lower court's decision.
revision dismissed; file sent to District and Sessions Judge for onward transmission to Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1135 of 1998
Revisionist :- Mohammad Umar Opposite Party :- Family Court Bareilly And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Km. Sunita Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J.
List has been revised.
None has appeared on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision.
Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 17.4.98 passed by Family Court, Bareilly in Suit No.363/95 u/s 125 CrPC, P.S. Hafizganj district Bareilly.
Learned AGA submits that the present revision is of the year 1998 and it appears that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest to pursue this matter, and there appears no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment and order passed by the court below, therefore, the present revision may be dismissed.
I have gone through the judgment and order passed by the court below and have also considered the arguments advanced by the learned AGA. Further no one appeared on behalf of revisionist to assist the Court pointing out any illegality or infirmity in both the judgments and orders passed by the courts below.
In view of the above, after having gone through the judgment and order under challenge, this Court comes to the conclusion that the same need no interference as there is no illegality or infirmity in the judgment and order under challenge, and further there appears force in the argument of the learned AGA that due to efflux of time the revisionist and his counsel have lost interest in pursuing the matter, therefore, the present revision is liable to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned District and Sessions Judge for its onward transmission to the concerned
Magistrate for compliance who will proceed further in the matter.
The file is consigned to record.
Order Date :- 3.3.2022 SP
Digitally signed by SALIM PRAVEJ Date: 2022.03.10 14:13:27 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
whether the revisionist had any valid ground to challenge the lower court's judgment due to alleged illegality or infirmity.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohammad Umar
Family Court Bareilly
Shamim Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
