Contention raised by learned counsel for the revisionists is that through under Section 156(3), the present FIR was registered on 23.9.2015 by the informant, Mumtaz, the mother of the prosecutrix, whereas the incident has been occurred on 3.8.2015. From the perusal of the first information report, Saif and Sufi Nafis (Tantrik) are revisionists, who are named in the first information report. There is a specific allegation in the first information report that Adnan and three others had committed gang rape upon the victim. In her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she has specifically said that all the accused persons had committed gang rape with her. Despite of the fact, the Investigating Officer of the case have submitted its report under section 173(2) of Cr.PC. only against Adnan s/o Wasim, dropping the name of others, though, in her 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. statements, she has attributed the role to all the four persons. Thereafter, in her testimony in the court as P.W.-2, she has reiterated the story mentioned in the prosecution case. It is further contended that belatedly an application was moved on behalf of the public prosecutor for summoning Saif and Sufi Nafis (Tantrik) to non-accused persons, to summon them in exercise of power under section 319 Cr.P.C.
