Criminal miscellaneous writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent and showed no interest in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5855 of 2000
Petitioner :- Vinay Bajaj Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Mukherjee Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Case taken up in the revised call. None is present for the petitioner. Learned A.G.A. is present.
On the previous dates the matter was listed but there was none for the petitioner.
It appears that the petitioner is no more interest in prosecution of the case.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 6.12.2022 Masarrat
Digitally signed by MASARRAT HUSAIN Date: 2022.12.07 10:36:32 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinay Bajaj
State of U.P.
Others
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
