The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed under S. 145 Cr.P.C. for want of prosecution as the matter had become infructuous due to lapse of time.
The writ petition dismissed; interim order dated 19.09.2006 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11142 of 2006
Petitioner :- Alimul Haq Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Nath Tripathi,T.S. Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Tripathi B.G. Bhai
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Case is taken up in the revised call. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for opposite party no.23 are present.
The matter relates to proceeding under Section 145 (1) Cr.P.C. It appears that due to lapse of time, it has become infructuous.
In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order dated 19.09.2006 stands vacated.
Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 5.12.2022
MN/-
Digitally signed by MAHENDRA NATH Date: 2022.12.05 16:25:12 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Alimul Haq
State of U.P.
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
