Petitioner's writ petition regarding maintenance allowance was dismissed as infructuous without hearing, citing a lapse of time. Conducted as a one-line order by a single judge.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9885 of 2006
Petitioner :- Smt. Bhagwati Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- O.P. Sharma Payod,Om Prakash Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Case is taken up in the revised call. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The matter relates to maintenance allowance.It appears that due to lapse of time, the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 5.12.2022
MN/-
Digitally signed by MAHENDRA NATH Date: 2022.12.05 16:25:17 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Bhagwati
State of U.P.
Another
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
