Criminal Misc. Writ Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to petitioner's lack of interest and lapse of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 350 of 2005
Petitioner :- Shanker And Two Others Respondent :- Additional Sessions Judge Ii Deoria And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Kumar,A.K. Srivastava,Anup Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,J.P. Gupta,V.N. Yadav
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Case taken up in the revised call. None is present either for the petitioners or for the O.P. Nos. 3 to 6. Learned A.G.A. is present.
It appears that due to lapse of time the writ petition has become infructuous and petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.11.2022 Masarrat
Digitally signed by MASARRAT HUSAIN Date: 2022.11.19 13:02:18 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shanker And Two Others
Additional Sessions Judge Ii Deoria And Others
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
