An application under Section 482 CrPC by Mohd. Imtiyaz and others was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court as infructuous due to lack of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5150 of 2013
Applicant :- Mohd. Imtiyaz And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Irfan Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Mehtab Alam
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Case taken up in the revised call.
None is present for the applicants.
State is represented through learned AGA.
It appears that due to lapse of time, the matter has become infructuous.
Due to this reason, no one is prosecuting the case.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.11.2022 C. MANI
Digitally signed by CHANDRAMANI VERMA Date: 2022.11.18 09:48:06 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Mohd. Imtiyaz And Others
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
