The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent, the learned A.G.A. was present, and the petition appeared infructuous due to the petitioner's lack of interest.
None. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12542 of 2005
Petitioner :- Kunj Lal Chaturvedi Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.P. Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Case taken up in the revised call. None is present for the petitioner. Learned A.G.A. is present.
It appears that due to lapse of time the writ petition has become infructuous and petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.11.2022 Masarrat
Digitally signed by MASARRAT HUSAIN Date: 2022.11.19 13:02:34 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Kunj Lal Chaturvedi
State of U.P.
Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
