The single-judge bench dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioners' counsel appearing in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15628 of 2006
Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar And Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.O.V.S. Chauhan,Vishnu Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- Govt. Advocate,Jai Singh,S.P. Tiwari
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of the petitioners. Learned AGA for the State is present.
In view of above, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Office is directed to communicate this order to the court below within two weeks positively.
Order Date :- 8.9.2022 AK Pandey
Digitally signed by ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY Date: 2022.09.17 13:39:55 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Kumar And Others
State of U.P.
SAMEER JAIN J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
