In this Section 482 Cr.P.C. case, the review bench dismissed the application for want of prosecution as only the State appeared and the applicant was absent. The interim order stood discharged.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5733 of 2007
Applicant :- Kari Gufran Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- P.K. Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of the applicant. Learned AGA for the State is present.
In view of above, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Office is directed to communicate this order to the court below within two weeks positively.
Order Date :- 7.9.2022 AK Pandey
Digitally signed by ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY Date: 2022.09.10 15:16:21 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kari Gufran
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
