Jaipal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application dismissed by the High Court for want of prosecution as the applicant was not present on the date of hearing.
Application dismissed by the High Court for want of prosecution as the applicant was not present on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2608 of 2007
Applicant :- Jaipal Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Singhal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of the applicant. Learned AGA for the State is present.
In view of above, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Office is directed to communicate this order to the court below within two weeks positively.
Order Date :- 8.9.2022 AK Pandey
Digitally signed by ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY Date: 2022.09.17 13:39:51 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Jaipal Singh
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
Anupam Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court