The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition as infructuous, allowing the petitioner's prayer and ending the proceedings without engaging substantive analysis.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 12698 of 2022
Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner comes up with the prayer to dismiss the writ petition as having become infructuous.
Prayer made is allowed.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 19.10.2022 n.u.
Digitally signed by NASEEM UDDIN Date: 2022.10.20 14:00:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Pradeep Kumar
State of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Narendra Kumar Johari
Naseem Uddin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
