Civil contempt application was dismissed due to the non-appearance of the applicant, with the court finding that the order was likely complied with or parties lost interest.
Contempt application dismissed with liberty to file for recall within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 829 of 2015
Applicant :- Satya Prakash Sharma Opposite Party :- Praveen Kumar Upadhyay S.I.O.S. G.B. Nagar Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Babu Vaish,Sri Ashok Khare
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List has been revised but nobody is present on behalf of the applicant though learned Standing Counsel is present.
From perusal of the record, it is clear that either the order of this court has been complied with or the parties have lost their interest to proceed with the matter.
In the circumstances, it is needless to keep pending this contempt application.
Accordingly, the present contempt is dismissed with liberty to file application for recall of this order within two months in case matter still survives if such an application is filed it need not be accompanied by any affidavit.
Order Date :- 6.9.2022 saqlain
Digitally signed by SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER Date: 2022.09.08 13:55:48 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Satya Prakash Sharma
Praveen Kumar Upadhyay
Prakash Padia
SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
