Allowed

Tuheeram v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Allahabad HC6 Sept 2022WRIC/26413/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of writ petition allowing a direction to Sub Divisional Magistrate, Khair, Aligarh to decide pending Election Petition No. T20211180203549 under U.P. Panchayat Raj Act expeditiously within six months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's writ petition disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide Election Petition No.T20211180203549 expeditiously within six months.

Tuheeram Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others — Public Procurement and Tenders | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 9

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26413 of 2022

¶3

Petitioner :- Tuheeram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmesh Kumar Shukla,Devesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Standing Counsel accepted notice on behalf of State-respondents.

¶6

In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not go to the private respondents.

¶7

The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition with the prayer to issue a mandamus directing the respondent No.2/Sub Divisional Magistrate, Khair, Aligarh to decide Election Petition No.T20211180203549 (Tuheeram Vs.Lalran and others) filed under Section 12C (1) and (6) of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act.

¶8

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is pending since long, till date no final decision has been taken in the matter, therefore, the petitioner is suffering from irreparable loss and injury and prays for expeditious disposal.

¶9

Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by petitioner.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the parties present. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties present, the present writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

¶11

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present

¶12

petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment.

¶13

Order Date :- 6.9.2022 saqlain

¶14

Digitally signed by SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER Date: 2022.09.07 09:24:57 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Tuheeram v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tuheeram v. State of U.P. and 8 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shambhu Nishad Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Shana Parveen Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Smt. Jyoti Singh Vs Harihar Prasad Bhatt Principal D.I.E.T. Bahraich

Dr. Baleshwar Prasad Mishra Vs Mr. Raj Pratap Singh Prin. Sec. Medical Education Lko.

Jay Prakash Vs State of U.P. and Another